EEAT started as a rater guideline. In 2026 it is effectively encoded into how LLMs choose sources. This post breaks each signal into concrete, shippable actions.
Experience: prove you have done the thing
First-person accounts, original screenshots, dated timelines, and named case studies all raise the experience signal. Generic 'ultimate guide' framing lowers it.
Expertise: name the humans
Every article needs a real author with a real bio, credentials, and links to their work. Ghost-written or 'staff' bylines correlate with lower trust scores in our tests.
Trust: technical hygiene matters more than you think
HTTPS, working contact pages, clear ownership, dated content, and a privacy policy are all trust signals LLMs and rater guidelines both weight.
Frequently asked questions
Is EEAT a ranking factor?
Not directly — but the underlying signals that inform it (author, citations, technical trust) are.
Do author bios actually help?
Yes. Real bios linked to Author schema and third-party profiles move both classic rankings and AI citation share.
Tags
Work with our team on this
Explore the services we use to ship the playbook above.
